Premier info portal for prediction markets. The start point of information market.
Loading…

Latest News

Sony v. Suno "Fair Use" Ruling: Where Does the Lawsuit That Could Define AI Music's Rules Go From Here?
Analysis
BusinessLegalMusic

Sony v. Suno "Fair Use" Ruling: Where Does the Lawsuit That Could Define AI Music's Rules Go From Here?

Pop Culture

I. Deal Overview


On September 10, Universal Music Group (UMG) announced a multi-year strategic agreement with AI audio company ElevenLabs to launch an AI-powered music creation platform, allowing fans to remix, mash up, and create "personalized vocal experiences" using tracks from artists who opt in to the program. This marks the latest in a string of settlements between record labels and AI companies over the past year or so — Warner previously settled with Suno, and UMG settled with Udio, both moving from litigation into commercial partnerships. Terms of the UMG-Udio deal, as previously reported, reportedly include a per-generation royalty of roughly $0.002 to $0.005, with higher rates for commercially distributed outputs, along with audit rights over training data.

By the end of this year, will UMG or Sony reach a settlement with Suno?

Yes
0.00%
No
0.00%
0 Polls

But not every rights holder is embracing that path. Sony Music is currently the only one of the three major labels still suing both Suno and Udio simultaneously. Behind that divergence lies a pivotal, unresolved lawsuit: the UMG and Sony case against Suno, where the central dispute is whether the "fair use" doctrine applies to AI training data.


The lawsuit was filed on June 24, 2024, when the RIAA, representing UMG, Sony, and Warner, brought a copyright infringement suit against AI music generation platform Suno in federal court in Massachusetts, accusing the company of copying copyrighted recordings "on a massive, ongoing basis" and feeding them into its AI model for training. The case's core question is whether training an AI model on copyrighted recordings constitutes "fair use" under U.S. copyright law — if it does, such use would not require permission or payment. Warner exited the lawsuit in November 2025 through a settlement agreement.


Notably, the litigation hasn't slowed Suno's commercial trajectory. The company raised more than $400 million in June 2026 at a $5.4 billion valuation, suggesting investors remain confident in its business even as the legal questions surrounding it stay unresolved.


Suno's position is that AI training constitutes "transformative use," and should therefore be recognized as fair use. The company has cited the precedent set in Bartz v. SoundAI, which ruled that using short audio clips for music recommendation algorithm analysis qualified as fair use.


The labels' position is that Suno's conduct amounts to substantial copying — the argument being that AI-generated songs ultimately compete directly with the original recordings in the marketplace, which they say does not meet the definition of "transformative use."


III. Why This Standoff Is Seen as Having "Industry-Defining" Weight


According to an analysis from TechTimes, Sony's litigation strategy reflects a calculation that the systemic value of a legal precedent outweighs that of any single settlement. A federal ruling establishing that unauthorized training constitutes infringement would compel every AI music company to secure licenses before training, potentially reshaping the economics of the entire generative AI music industry.


Independent legal case-tracking outlet AI Vortex offered a similar assessment: "If Suno wins on fair use, it blows up every licensing deal in the AI music space. If it loses, the UMG-Udio template becomes the industry standard."


This question isn't confined to U.S. courts, either. On July 31, a regional court in Munich, Germany, ruled against Suno in a case brought by GEMA, Germany's music rights collecting society, finding that permanently encoding copyrighted songs into the company's model weights constituted infringement — the first ruling of its kind against a generative AI music platform anywhere in the world. While that decision doesn't bind the Massachusetts court, it does give Sony's legal team an international precedent to point to, even though it was decided under a different legal framework than the one governing the U.S. case.


One counterweight worth noting: Billboard has reported that in two earlier copyright cases brought by book authors against AI companies (Anthropic and Meta), judges in both instances found that training large language models constituted "transformative use." Legal experts caution, however, that this reasoning doesn't necessarily transfer to the music industry's cases, and it shouldn't be read as evidence that AI companies already hold the upper hand.


IV. Current Status: Litigation Still in Early Stages, Settlement Talks Once Stalled


In May of this year, Sony and UMG sought to expand the case from 560 tracks to 61,026, arguing that audio fingerprinting had turned up millions of matches in Suno's training data. That motion, however, was formally denied by the judge on August 18. That same day, the judge granted the plaintiffs' request to add a new claim accusing Suno of circumventing YouTube's anti-download protections to illegally obtain training data — a practice often referred to as "stream ripping." The amended complaint was formally filed on August 25.


According to a Billboard report from roughly two weeks ago, motions for summary judgment on the fair use question aren't due until April 2027, meaning a substantive ruling remains a considerable way off. Separately, independent musicians have also filed their own class-action claims against Suno, adding another layer of legal pressure beyond the major labels' case.


Settlement talks between UMG and Suno reportedly stalled back in April of this year. Suno is currently trying to keep the terms of its licensing agreement with Warner confidential, out of concern that UMG and Sony would use those terms as a baseline for their own negotiations.


For historical context: Warner reached a settlement with Suno in November 2025, converting the relationship into a licensing agreement, while UMG and Udio moved to a "strategic partnership" in October 2025 — in both cases, the parties opted for an out-of-court settlement before the case reached the stage of a formal ruling.

"Tip Toe" Premieres in the US: Can It Repeat Its UK Success?
Editorial
Film&TV

"Tip Toe" Premieres in the US: Can It Repeat Its UK Success?

Pop Culture

I. Deal Overview

"Tip Toe" is a five-episode limited series created by Russell T Davies, known for "Doctor Who," "Queer as Folk," and "It's a Sin." The show stars Alan Cumming and David Morrissey and aired on the UK's Channel 4 from May 31 to June 9. It's set for a US premiere on October 2 via Starz. The story follows two men in Manchester who have been neighbors for nearly 15 years, tracing how rising social tensions gradually turn them from neighbors into enemies. The series takes a sharp, unflinching approach to a range of sensitive social issues.

By October 9, will "Tip Toe" have a Rotten Tomatoes critics' score above 85%?

Yes
0.00%
No
100.00%
1 Polls

II. Content and Production Background

The first episode opens with a graphic depiction of Leo being hanged outside his own apartment — a scene The Hollywood Reporter called "one of the most jarring pieces of television this year." The show tackles online radicalization, anti-LGBTQ+ bias, the spread of disinformation in the digital age, and generational conflict. It was produced entirely with UK funding, and Cumming himself has said he doubts something like it would get made in the US anytime soon, citing both content boundaries and broader censorship concerns.

III. UK Reception: Near-Unanimous Critical Praise

On the numbers side, the show holds a 93% critics' score on Rotten Tomatoes, with an 81% audience score, and an 8.2 rating on IMDb — all solid figures, with the critics' score notably outpacing the audience score. The Guardian's veteran TV critic Lucy Mangan gave it 3.5 stars, writing that while the show takes some detours along the way, it remains bold and deeply affecting overall, calling it part of a resurgence of "state of the nation" television. Another Guardian review described it as "tense, socially urgent television," singling out Cumming and Morrissey's performances as standouts. According to a roundup by HuffPost UK, critics across multiple outlets converged on words like "devastating" and "unforgettable," painting a broadly consistent picture of praise.

IV. Current Signals: The Backdrop for Its US Debut

The show's US launch date happens to fall close to a real hate crime that made national news. In the early hours of August 31, a shooting occurred outside a gay bar called Venture-N in Tucson, Arizona; the suspect killed two men before taking his own life. Police found a list of LGBTQ+-related businesses and a note expressing anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment on the suspect, and the case is being investigated as a hate crime. On September 3, roughly 1,000 people gathered for a candlelight vigil to mourn the victims.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Davies, Cumming, and Morrissey sat for their first joint interview about the show's US release — discussing the series' reception in the UK and their hopes for how it might resonate with American and global audiences — and that interview took place not long after the Tucson shooting. This real-world context could heighten attention and discussion around the show's US release, though it could also invite divided reactions given how closely the subject matter brushes up against a recent, real tragedy.

Paramount Repeats Demand That States and WGA Post $1.88 Billion Bond Over Warner Bros. Merger Delay, After AGs Argue Company Is Trying to ‘Offload Its Responsibility’ for Ticking Fees
News Flash
LegalBusinessFilm&TV

Paramount Repeats Demand That States and WGA Post $1.88 Billion Bond Over Warner Bros. Merger Delay, After AGs Argue Company Is Trying to ‘Offload Its Responsibility’ for Ticking Fees

Pop Culture

Paramount Skydance on Tuesday reiterated its demand in a court filing that the 12 states and the WGA — whose antitrust lawsuits seek to block its takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery — post $1.88 billion in bond as security for the losses Paramount would incur if the deal doesn’t close until after the trial concludes next spring.

U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin, who is hearing the cases, has set a Sept. 24 hearing date to consider Paramount’s bond request.

As of the September 24 hearing, will the judge approve Paramount's bond request?

Yes
0.00%
No
0.00%
0 Polls

Paramount filed its request for the states and the WGA to pony up the $1.88 billion bond on Aug. 17. In an Aug. 31 filing opposing the bond motion, the states — led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta — argued that Paramount’s potential financial losses are of its own making.

In their opposition reply, the states said that “Paramount now wishes to offload its responsibility” for agreeing to pay WBD shareholders a “ticking fee” of $7 million per day starting Oct. 1 until the deal clsoes. “But whatever regret Paramount may feel for its commitments to Warner Bros., to Plaintiff States, to the WGA, and to the Court, it cannot show that the Court acted ‘improvidently’ in signing the joint stipulation. Nor can Paramount show why the public or a nonprofit labor union should underwrite its acquisition of Warner Bros.”

But Paramount insists that the states and the WGA must “accept the financial consequences” if they lose in court.

“If plaintiffs insist that this transaction is paused during the pendency of their lawsuit, they must accept the financial consequences if their challenge ultimately fails,” a Paramount spokesperson said Tuesday. “Paramount agreed to delay closing to facilitate a prompt resolution of the case, while expressly preserving its legal rights and we continue to honour that agreement. We are not asking the district court to lift the no-close order, but to require enforcement of the bond that protects our financial interests while the litigation remains pending.”

Paramount argues in its filing that the Clayton Act and Rule 65 require plaintiffs to accept responsibility for the “substantial financial harm” incurred if their challenge ultimately fails. “Paramount agreed to delay closing to facilitate a prompt trial. It did not waive its right to the bond protection required while the transaction is paused,” the company said.

“[A]t the eleventh hour, after dragging their investigations out for many months without providing feedback on any areas of competitive concern, and just days before final regulatory approvals from the European Commission were secured, plaintiff states filed suit seeking to stymie the transaction while immunising themselves from economic accountability if Paramount prevails,” the company said in its filing. “Paramount simply asks that Plaintiffs honour what the Clayton Act requires: A bond that will compensate Paramount for the damage it will suffer if the injunction proves improvidently granted, i.e., if Paramount ultimately prevails in the litigation and was therefore wrongly prevented from consummating the merger now, as it is prepared to do.”

Paramount argued that “the states never dispute that evidence or otherwise contest that Paramount will suffer financial injury as a result of the Order, both from the ticking fee and the incremental financing costs — a financial harm that the states outright ignore.” The filing is at this link.

Paramount said it “has satisfied all closing conditions under the merger agreement and received clearances from regulators representing 69 jurisdictions. These two lawsuits are the only remaining barrier to closing this transaction.”

Oasis' Rumored Manchester Residency: The Next Case in a Global Residency Wave?
Quick Take
Music

Oasis' Rumored Manchester Residency: The Next Case in a Global Residency Wave?

Pop Culture

I. Band Background: A Reunion After 16 Years, and a Tour That Just Wrapped


Liam and Noel Gallagher split years ago amid a long-running feud, before reuniting for the "Live '25" reunion tour in 2025. The tour launched in Cardiff, Wales, on July 4, followed by a five-night run at Heaton Park in their hometown of Manchester, then stops in London, Edinburgh, and Dublin, along with dates across North and South America. The tour wrapped in São Paulo, Brazil, on November 22 and 23, without any official mention of a Manchester residency.

By October 10, will Oasis officially announce a Manchester residency?

Yes
0.00%
No
0.00%
0 Polls


II. Where the Rumor Started: Liam's Repeated Hints


At the end of the London Wembley Stadium show on September 28 — the tour's marquee stop — Liam offered an informal hint about plans for the following year. In the months since, he's kept the speculation alive on social media with mixed signals: in November, asked whether 2026 shows were coming, he replied, "I know things you don't"; when asked what he wanted for Christmas, he said "a European tour." Yet in a separate interview, he flatly said there would be no 2026 tour.


III. The Manchester Residency Rumor


According to a September 9 Hollywood Reporter report, a rumored Manchester residency, if it materializes, would mark a major homecoming for the band, and the outlet grouped it alongside Backstreet Boys' upcoming 10-show residency honoring Germany as a similar case of artists returning to places with personal significance. Noel Gallagher, asked recently on talkSPORT about next year's plans, said, "There's no football tournament on next year, so the summer, we've gotta do something" — read by some as an encouraging sign.


According to the Manchester Evening News, sources tied to Manchester City FC and concert promoters suggest the band could perform a 12-night residency at Etihad Stadium in May and June 2027, potentially expanding to 20 shows, with a downtown hotel reportedly booked for the band through that period. None of this has been officially confirmed. An earlier unofficial source had predicted an announcement in August 2026, which has not materialized.

"You Can See Everything": A Notorious Fraud Case Gets Another Look — What Kind of Impact Did the Telluride Surprise Screening Leave on Audiences?
Editorial
Film&TV

"You Can See Everything": A Notorious Fraud Case Gets Another Look — What Kind of Impact Did the Telluride Surprise Screening Leave on Audiences?

Pop Culture

I. Deal Overview


"You Can See Everything," an A24 documentary co-directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim — the latter also directed the recently released film "Primetime" — centers on one of Silicon Valley's most notorious cases of corporate fraud. The film follows Elizabeth Holmes, founder of the blood-testing startup Theranos, which was once valued at $9 billion on the claim that it could run hundreds of tests from just a few drops of blood. That core technology was ultimately found to have been falsified, and Holmes was convicted of defrauding investors; she is currently serving her prison sentence. This documentary captures her real experience in the period surrounding her incarceration.

As of the date Rotten Tomatoes first publishes an official Tomatometer score, will "You Can See Everything" score above 90%?

Yes
0.00%
No
0.00%
0 Polls

The film premiered as a "mystery screening" at the Telluride Film Festival on the night of September 7. Prior to the screening, its contents were kept entirely secret — audiences only knew that a "mystery A24 film" would be shown that night, with the specific title revealed only once they were in the theater. A theatrical release is set for October, though a specific date has not yet been announced.


II. Content and Approach: A Hybrid of Real Documentary Footage and Reenactment


Filming began in 2023 and captured Holmes' final 34 days before she formally entered prison, shot at the home she rented in San Diego, with footage of her daily life alongside her partner, Billy Evans, and their two children.


One particular technique stands out: some of the offscreen exchanges between Fielder and Holmes in the film were reenacted with the participation of a well-known actress, rather than consisting purely of authentic footage. This gives the documentary a distinctive hybrid form, blending genuine documentary material with a kind of semi-fictional reenactment.


III. Current Signals: An Enthusiastic Reception, but No Official Score Yet


According to first reactions compiled by The Hollywood Reporter, audiences described the viewing experience with words like "shocking," "incredible," "insane," and "what did I just watch." Variety's review called it "one of the closest things to the antithesis of a 'pure' documentary," describing it as a distinctive combination of "a reality-TV-style buddy film and a psychodrama circus."


One important caveat: at the time these "first reaction" reports were published, official critics' reviews had not yet come out — The Hollywood Reporter's own coverage noted that "formal reviews are imminent." That means the current wave of enthusiasm comes entirely from audience reactions shared on social media in real time, and does not yet reflect a Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic score built on a larger, more settled sample of critical opinion.

Macklemore's "Free Palestine" Chant at Ed Sheeran's Tour Sparks Controversy — Will Sheeran Respond?
Quick Take
Celebrities

Macklemore's "Free Palestine" Chant at Ed Sheeran's Tour Sparks Controversy — Will Sheeran Respond?

Pop Culture

I. Deal Overview
Macklemore, serving as the opening act on Ed Sheeran's North American "Loop" tour, shouted "free Palestine" during his September 4 set at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, and displayed Gaza-related imagery on the stadium's screens while performing his protest song "Hind's Hall."

By October 1, will Ed Sheeran or his team issue a public statement on this matter?

Yes
0.00%
No
100.00%
2 Polls

The moment prompted the Israeli American Council (IAC) to launch a petition calling on Sheeran to remove Macklemore from the tour's remaining dates, arguing that "this was an Ed Sheeran concert" rather than a political event. The petition states: "The issue is not whether Macklemore has the right to hold political views. The question is where the line should be drawn when an opening act uses a global concert platform to advance a one-sided political agenda."


II. Where Things Stand


During his second show the following night, September 5, Macklemore addressed the backlash directly, saying that "criticism of Israel, criticism of apartheid, being against genocide in no way is a criticism" of Jewish people, adding, "none of us will be free until we are all free."


According to Martin Cid Magazine, the petition has not succeeded so far — Macklemore completed both scheduled performances and remains on the tour. Sheeran himself has not publicly commented on the matter, while singer P!nk shared content critical of Macklemore. No official response from Sheeran's team has been issued at this time.

Tupac’s Murder Finally Has a Guilty Verdict. But the Mystery Isn’t Over
News Flash
Celebrities

Tupac’s Murder Finally Has a Guilty Verdict. But the Mystery Isn’t Over

Pop Culture

For all the mythic stature of Tupac Shakur, you’d have expected his murder trial to have been held somewhere with a little more grandeur. Maybe the Las Vegas Motor Speedway or the Thomas & Mack Center, a basketball and concert arena whose gala opening starred Frank Sinatra and Diana Ross. But for the last two weeks, jurors, bailiffs, members of the press, fans, and the families of Shakur and the defendant, Duane “Keffe D” Davis, packed tightly into a cramped windowless courtroom that felt barely bigger than the box of Cuban cigars that Death Row CEO Suge Knight loved to smoke.

By the end of October, will prosecutors or police formally charge or pursue other alleged co-conspirators in this case?

Yes
0.00%
No
100.00%
1 Polls

For 30 years, the killing of 2Pac has occupied the same American conspiratorial headspace as the Malcolm X assassination, Elvis sightings, and Roswell — a mystery that bred its own industrial complex, complete with fake death theories and amateur numerologists. Then, in September 2023, a Clark County grand jury indicted Davis, a reputed shot caller for the South Side Compton Crips, for murder with a deadly weapon.

The state alleged that Davis obtained and handed off a .40-caliber Glock to his nephew, Orlando Anderson, who prosecutors say fired the fatal shots that killed the 25-year-old rapper just off the Las Vegas Strip on Sept. 7, 1996. Their theory of the case was Occam’s Razor simple: a revenge slaying that occurred roughly two and a half hours after Shakur, Knight, and some of their Death Row henchmen stomped out Anderson following a Mike Tyson fight at the MGM Grand.

Most of the evidence heard by the jury came from Davis himself — including a secretly recorded 2008 proffer agreement given to a federal task force, a subsequent interview with a Las Vegas Metro homicide detective, appearances on pay-to-play podcasts and BET’s Death Row Chronicles docuseries, and his own book, Compton Street Legend.

The defense denied the allegations, claiming that Davis was a serial fabulist seeking to entertain and profit off long-standing rumors connecting him to the case. The state was unable to produce the murder weapon, the identity of whoever rented the white Cadillac that witnesses say fired on Shakur, or any tangible documentation that Davis was in Las Vegas the night of the murder. During opening statements, defense attorney Michael Sanft summed up his case on a single PowerPoint slide: my client is just a “bullshitter.”

During the trial, the easily understood cause-and-effect theory of the killing became entangled in the labyrinth that has characterized the last 30 years of whodunit theories: there were allegations of a role played by Bad Boy CEO Sean “Diddy” Combs in the murder, accusations of law enforcement corruption, the interconnectedness with the 1997 homicide of Christopher “The Notorious B.I.G.” Wallace, and enough far-fetched speculation to give even Candace Owens pause.

The trial was far more than a series of witnesses assembled to prove who killed 2Pac. It doubled as a history of Compton gang life and the story of the Death Row and Bad Boy beef. It was an indictment of hip-hop’s warped, symbiotic relationship with the media and an explanation of why it took law enforcement nearly three decades to make an arrest. This was no gangsta rap Nuremberg, but rather something closer to the trial of Adolf Eichmann — a case tried decades later in which the aging defendant wasn’t the actual killer but a banal middleman, a functionary and a lethal node of transport.

It all leads to this moment in courtroom 12B. After barely two hours of deliberation, the jury reaches a verdict, causing the defendant and Shakur’s families to rush back to the twelfth floor. A bailiff politely instructs the 2Pac acolytes who have flocked from across the country in search of long-deferred justice:

“We have to treat this as a really reverent thing. Be calm, quiet, and respectful,” says the burly marshal wearing a baseball cap and pointed gray goatee. “This is a big day, we know.”

The defendant and his attorney, Michael Sanft, wrap arms around one another, whispering a few final thoughts before the moment of judgment. The prosecutors, Marc DiGiacomo and Binu Palal, seem loose, confident that the speed of the jury’s decision is evidence in their favor. A couple of audience members nervously crack jokes to break the tension, but no one laughs. And when the creaky door opens to allow in the jury members, everyone snaps back in their seats.

The room grows as silent as this whirling slot machine of a city can get. A jury foreman passes the verdict to Judge Carli Kierny.

Most of Shakur’s surviving family stare intensely ahead — including his sister Sekyiwa, his stepbrother and collaborator, Mopreme Shakur, and his extended clan. The judge tells Davis, 63 years old, to stand up to receive the verdict. Facing life imprisonment, he flashes a somber glower toward the judge, his hangdog facial features drooping even heavier.

Kierny informs him of his fate:

“We the jury find the defendant Duane Keith Davis as follows — Count One. Murder with the use of a deadly weapon. Guilty.”

Shakur’s sister fights back tears. A relative next to her offers a box of tissues and she dries her eyes. In the first row, his family holds each other’s hands tightly, remaining silent but visibly filled with gratitude.

On the other side of the bench, Davis’ son remains stoic, but closes his eyes, leaning against the uncomfortable cloth seats, devastated at the prospect of losing his father to the penitentiary system.

For a few seconds, the courtroom grows completely quiet. No visible joy, no exaltation, no loud weeping. Then Davis is escorted out, raising his fist to his son and the rest of the gallery. The prosecutors hug Shakur’s family, who can finally exhale. His sister continues to weep. One of his cousins raises a fist in triumph as everyone files out, completely stunned that this day actually arrived. There is nothing to celebrate, merely a tremendous sigh of relief.

The questions were the same for three decades. What really happened to Shakur on that snake-eyed night in Las Vegas? And how was it possible that law enforcement never charged anyone for the crime despite decades of credible-seeming rumors and outright admissions?

No one stated the paradox more succinctly than Chris Rock: “2Pac was gunned down on the Las Vegas Strip after a Mike Tyson fight. How many witnesses do you need to see some shit before you arrest somebody? More people saw 2Pac get shot than the last episode of Seinfeld.”

The trial played out like a crash course in the Bad Boy and Death Row feud that preceded the violence in Las Vegas, as well as the retaliatory Compton gang war that followed Shakur’s death. The state’s final witness, former Compton gang unit detective Robert Ladd, described the carnage as “ten days of hell,” where three were killed and ten more wounded.

Some of the next-to-last moments of Shakur’s life were exhibited to the jury inside this 19-story, pink sandstone and glass fortress downtown — its walls etched with quotes from Margaret Thatcher and St. Augustine about the importance of personal responsibility and hearing the other side. In these clips, Shakur celebrates in the backstage arteries of the MGM’s Grand Garden arena directly after Tyson’s victory over Bruce Seldon. He throws mini-uppercuts. His shirt is almost fully unbuttoned, chain dangling, looking for a target to direct his adrenaline rush. It’s Sept. 7, 1996. He’s 25 years old. Out on bail. For all the morbid premonitions of his music, he appears untouchable.

We next spot the multi-platinum superstar as a jumbled blur on surveillance cameras: Shakur punches and tackles Anderson, better known as “Baby Lane” within his faction of the Crips. Joined by his crew, Shakur stomps him out before the stunned gamblers and boxing fans. Then, a horde of onlookers zombie-stagger after Shakur and Knight, out of the casino, toward Las Vegas Boulevard. In open court, everyone watches this grainy security footage like the Zapruder film.

The MGM fight was said to be the result of one of Shakur and Knight’s entourage members pointing out Anderson, a Crip rival, who’d allegedly stolen a Death Row chain from him in a fight in Lakewood a few months earlier. The inciting incident behind the murder of one of the greatest rappers of all time very well might have been triggered by an ostensibly insignificant brawl at a mall Foot Locker. But no police reports were written at the time. No employees offered testimony. The only living witness to that day who took the stand, an ex-South Side Compton Crip named Devonta “Dirt Rock” Lee, was subpoenaed and forced to testify upon threat of being held in contempt of court.

Wearing a gray designer t-shirt and a pair of dangling gold Jesus pieces, Lee looked like a colonoscopy would’ve been less invasive. Nonetheless, he corroborated the basic details of the mayhem: the disrespect the chain snatching meant to Death Row, the fight that got so out of hand that the Foot Locker had to be remodeled, and the looming violence fulfilled in Las Vegas.

About a year before Shakur’s murder, Knight declared war from the podium of the 1995 Source Awards, mocking an unnamed executive producer (obviously Combs) for being “all in the videos, all on the records…dancing.” In his own speech at the New York awards show, Combs attempted to make peace, but in September 1995, one of Knight’s close Compton friends and bodyguards, Jake Robles, was shot and killed at an Atlanta nightclub.

According to the testimony of Reggie Wright Jr., the ex-head of Death Row security and a fixture in three decades of competing theories about Shakur’s death, “the story that was told to us” was that someone in Bad Boy was associated with his murder. A few weeks later, Knight bailed Shakur out of a New York State prison, pending his appeal on a first-degree sexual abuse conviction. Suspicious that the Notorious B.I.G. and Combs had set him up to be shot in 1994, Shakur began eviscerating Bad Boy, too. This was around the same time that Combs put a bounty on Knight and Shakur’s heads, according to Keffe D’s original statements to detectives.

“He said that he’d give anything for these guys’ heads,” Davis said in a recording that was played for the jury in its entirety.

Combs allegedly declared this in an Anaheim hotel suite after a Bad Boy concert, in front of then-CEO of Motown, Andre Harrell, and about 40 members of the South Side Compton Crips. Keffe D claimed that Combs was “scared to death” of the “Big CEO” (Knight), and had enlisted the Crips to protect him on his West Coast trips.

By the spring of 1996, tensions between the two labels and their gang member praetorian guards escalated to the point where a Crip tasked to protect Combs allegedly pulled out a gun on Death Row after the 1996 Soul Train Awards. Wright Jr. corroborated it. Then about three months before his murder, Shakur dropped “Hit ‘Em Up,” a scorched earth diss song that opens with him bragging about sleeping with Biggie’s wife.

Shortly thereafter, Keffe D said that Combs summoned him to a late night rendezvous at Greenblatt’s Deli on the Sunset Strip, where the hot-headed impresario reaffirmed his desire to eliminate Knight and Pac.

“I took him downstairs and he’s like, ‘Man, I got to get rid of them dudes, man. They going to be a problem,” Keffe D said in a recording played in court.

“After that “Hit ‘Em Up” came out,” he continued. “Yeah, that pissed them off.”

The investigators attempted to have Davis clarify:

“So he’s like, ‘kill both them?”

“Yeah.”

According to Davis, Combs offered a million-dollar reward. He accepted and joked in his statement to investigators that he would’ve happily had them whacked for $50,000. Over the years, Combs has repeatedly denied these accusations.

The jury heard Davis tell the story over and over, across three decades, and none of the versions entirely aligned.

The first came in 1998, after a federal drug arrest that sent him to prison for five and a half years. Interviewed by authorities, Davis denied any knowledge or connection to Shakur’s killing. The statement wasn’t recorded but reached the jury through testimony from former federal agent Wade Lee. In this version of events, Davis, Anderson, and their girlfriends returned to the Excalibur after the fight at the MGM; he theorized that the culprits may have been Compton police officers working for Death Row.

The second came a decade later. In 2008, a federal task force working the Notorious B.I.G. murder ensnared Davis in a narcotics case. Facing the prospect of dying in prison, he told investigators he had something that would “blow their fucking mind.”

In his statement to a Las Vegas homicide detective, Davis described meeting up in the MGM parking lot with Eric “Von Zip” Martin, the main conduit between him and Combs. The late narcotics kingpin and Harlem entrepreneur was so close to Bad Boy that Biggie Smalls named Martin his son’s “godfather” and Combs frequently referred to him as “uncle.” And in Vegas, Davis claimed that Martin told him that now was the “perfect time” to “handle business,” right before handing him the Glock that supposedly killed Shakur.

In this retelling, Davis sat shotgun in a white Cadillac alongside three other associates from the South Side Crips, including his nephew, Anderson. After lying in wait at Knight’s club, where Shakur was supposed to perform, Davis says that they got frustrated and decided to leave. But right as they left, they spotted Shakur and Knight stalled at the intersection of East Flamingo Road and Koval Lane, their presence announced by a carful of girls screaming “2Pac!!” (one of the women refuted this characterization in court).

It was then that Davis claimed that he pulled out the .40-caliber Glock and passed it to the backseat for someone to take aim. In some interviews, Davis was cagey and refused to name the shooter. In others, he stated that Anderson delivered the four fatal shots into Knight’s 750-series BMW. In one statement, Davis admitted that he would’ve been willing to shoot had the Cadillac approached from a different angle. Then he diagrammed their getaway. The gun was never found. He claimed they parked the rental car at a nearby hotel and hid it atop one of the tires. When they returned the next morning it was gone.

The money was never delivered. According to Keffe D’s proffer and subsequent retellings, Martin accepted a half-million from Combs—half the work completed—but never passed it along.

Back in Compton, about three weeks after Shakur’s murder, more than 300 officers drawn from 11 agencies raided 38 residences, seizing a fantastic quantity of rifles, handguns, and machine pistols, $17,000 in cash, and two pounds each of coke, meth, and weed. Twenty-three arrests were made, including Anderson. But no one was willing to talk about the crime that most interested them. Anderson was set free. About 18 months later, he was murdered in Compton over a money dispute, unrelated to Shakur’s murder. He was 23 years old.

After returning home from his penitentiary sentence in the mid-00s, Davis says that he made multiple attempts to reach out to Combs. None of the phone calls were returned.  

“I hate the day I met Puff.  He destroyed my life,” Davis said in his BET interview played before the jury. “Now he’s super rich. That motherfucker ain’t even send me a pair of Sean John drawers.”

By any standard, it was a surreal trial. The murder happened when technology was a quirky novelty, not a permanent shadow. There were no cell phone records to place Davis in Las Vegas. Neither DNA nor fingerprints nor hotel or credit card receipts. No iPhone footage of the attack to replay in gruesome slow motion. Except for Davis, everyone who rode in that white Cadillac is dead—the next-to-last survivor, driver Terrence “Bubble Up” Brown, was shot in 2015 at a Compton marijuana dispensary. The only other witness who could identify the shooter is Knight, and you would’ve had a better chance of Shakur walking into the courthouse than Knight swearing to tell the whole truth. There were corroborating witnesses and a little bit of circumstantial evidence, but the verdict hinged upon one man’s repeated admissions of guilt.

The trial was a trail of the dead — a roll call of minor players, long deceased, mentioned in an offhand fragment of testimony. Men whose colorful nicknames once carried weight, lost in practically forgotten street wars only to briefly materialize and quickly vanish: Buntry, Bubble Up, Hen Dog, Big Jake, Heron, Monk.

What the streets couldn’t accomplish, the ravages of age, disease, and stress finished off. In 2012, cancer took Zip Martin. The following year, “Big Frank” Alexander, the bodyguard tasked to protect Shakur in Las Vegas, committed suicide. Russell Poole, the LAPD detective, the first cop to openly link the two murders, is gone. So is Tim “Blondie” Brennan, the Compton gang unit detective, whose old investigative partner, Robert Ladd, openly mourned his friend on the witness stand. Even the original coroner is dead.

It was as much about what and who didn’t appear in court as what did. Despite the best efforts of prosecutors Marc DiGiacomo and Binu Palal, several potential witnesses vanished without a trace. Everyone from former mayor Oscar Goodman to members of the Shakur family, Knight to the current governor of Nevada, Joe Lombardo, popped up on the potential witness list, but nearly all the prominent names weren’t called. None of the truly creative conspiracy theories were litigated for a jury to decide. There were no revelations about FBI surveillance or any proof that Shakur actually absconded to Cuba.

The closest it came was when Leonard Jefferson, the photographer who took Shakur’s famous last photo, described the shooting and the chaos after.

...

Even some of the most heavily invested in the case don’t seem to entirely believe the conclusion. Last week, Knight called in to TMZ from the RJ Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, where he’s less than halfway through a 28-year sentence for voluntary manslaughter. According to the former CEO of Death Row, defense lawyers offered him a million dollars to take the stand and say that Davis wasn’t in the white Cadillac that night. Sanft denied it, and told reporters that he had taken the case pro bono.

“I feel sort of sad for him. I’m not saying he’s guilty or innocent. That man is on trial fighting for his life. And it’s sad that the police who was involved did what they was supposed to do, for the other people,” Knight said, adding that “crooked cops” and off-duty officers are “1,000 percent” behind 2Pac’s murder. “There was definitely more than one person involved. The people who got their hands in it is trying to muddy the waters.”

If you can untangle what Suge is saying, it sounds like he’s trying to make the case that Keffe D is just a patsy à la Lee Harvey Oswald, an easy decoy to absorb the blame, and deflect from a nefarious plot that would ensnare people at the highest levels of power, should it ever be exposed.

Even 2Pac’s own biological father rejected the court’s decision. On his Facebook page, William Garland wrote that the “prosecutor presented questionable policemen, some corrupt some not…questionable individuals who made money off of the miss representation [sic] of the truth with documentary’s [sic] and books of lies…snitches and gang bangers and that’s all….WHERE’S THE TRUTH WHERE’S JUSTICE? Some say in [sic] died it the hospital that Friday September 13, 1996 and all we have left is theater, speculation, lies, and bullshit welcome to the cover up of a trial that creates more questions than answers Tupac deserves better, his followers and his family deserve better.”

Gary Oldman Claims James Bond Has Been Cast, As He Backs Jack Lowden To Play 007
News Flash
Film&TV

Gary Oldman Claims James Bond Has Been Cast, As He Backs Jack Lowden To Play 007

Pop Culture

Gary Oldman has claimed that the next James Bond has been decided.

In an interview with Canada’s Global, Oldman backed his Slow Horses co-star Jack Lowden to play 007, saying he had his “fingers crossed” for the Scottish actor.

Oldman said: “It’s been rumored that he’s on the shortlist. We’re going to find out pretty soon, aren’t we? Because they have picked him. They have made their choice, but they have not announced it yet. So my fingers are crossed for Jack.”

It’s not clear from Oldman’s comments whether he means that Lowden has been cast as Bond, or whether he is talking more generally about Amazon MGM Studios alighting on Ian Fleming’s secret agent.

Amazon MGM Studios has been approached for comment.

Watch on Deadline

Deadline reported over the summer that auditions were taking place for James Bond in August. Producers Amy Pascal and David Heyman, as well as director Denis Villeneuve, informed talent who had been shortlisted.

At the time, we reported that Harris Dickinson, Callum Turner, and Jacob Elordi fit the idea of Bond that Amazon MGM Studios had in mind.

Who’d You Pick as the Next James Bond?
As Amazon MGM Studios officially takes creative control of the 007 franchise from its longtime producers, Amazon Executive Chair Jeff Bezos riled up the internet with a single question on X, sparking a global frenzy over who will succeed Daniel Craig. Among the myriad of fan-casting theories, Henry Cavill—
Critics call out Kaia Gerber and Homer Gere 'nepo baby' Vogue cover
News Flash
CelebritiesFashion

Critics call out Kaia Gerber and Homer Gere 'nepo baby' Vogue cover

Pop Culture

Vogue's 2026 September issue is a nostalgic nod to one of its beloved covers of the past. But the internet has other thoughts about the throwback-inspired cover shoot.

Kaia Gerber and Homer Gere are making waves as fashion icons and as the stars of FX’s “The Shards,” Ryan Murphy’s adaptation of Bret Easton Ellis’ coming-of-age novel. The two actors are posing together on Vogue's cover nearly 35 years after their famous parents, Cindy Crawford and Richard Gere, posed on their own 1992 cover.

Will Vogue's editorial team or Chloe Malle herself issue a public response within September?

Yes
50.00%
No
50.00%
4 Polls

And while Gerber and Gere's best-friend-style shoot received some praise from fashion industry insiders as well as the actors' famous families, the September issue cover — which has served as the holy grail of elaborate celebrity images throughout its history — has sparked online criticism for lack of creativity and has been dubbed the latest "nepo baby" spectacle.

"Nepotism pro max. The September cover used to mean something," one Instagram user commented on Vogue's post of the cover.

Another added, "This looks like the cover of some cheap magazine, not even Vogue, and definitely not a cover for the September issue."

On Threads, users further critiqued the magazine cover and even went as far as to recreate the Gerber and Gere photo as a faux Target campaign image.

View on Threads

"Nothing says 'American fashion in 2026' quite like Vogue putting two nepo babies on its September cover to recreate their famous parents’ shoot against millennial gray," one Threads user posted. "Kaia Gerber and Homer Gere are gorgeous. But my god. Where is the risk? Where is the ART??"

"Combine nepotism, denial and this economy and BOOM! This year’s September issue. Yawn," another user said.

Crawford, one of the world's most famous supermodels, and Gere, the actor of "Pretty Woman" fame, were the ultimate '90s power couple. The pair, who met in 1988, married in 1991 in a no-fuss wedding ceremony “at 6 o'clock on Thursday night,” the model told Arsenio Hall on an episode of his eponymously named talk show. The fashion wasn't fancy either. Crawford went on to say at the time that she put on “some old suit that I'd had forever” and made their wedding bands herself, using tinfoil. Shortly after the couple was married, they posed together for their iconic Vogue cover shoot, photographed by legendary photographer Herb Ritts.

Crawford, now 60, and Gere, 76, announced their split on Dec. 1, 1994. Fast forward to 2026, Crawford’s daughter, Kaia, with husband Rande Gerber, and Gere’s son, Homer, with ex-wife Carey Lowell, play love interests in the new FX series. The nostalgic fandom surrounding the two actors and their famous parents was the inspiration that landed them on the September cover of Vogue.

In a recent interview with USA TODAY, Gerber explained how she and Homer Gere broke the ice before filming by addressing the elephant in the room: their parents' past relationship and marriage.

"I knew obviously we were going to address it," Gerber said at "The Shards" July 27 premiere at New York's SVA Theatre. "So I think I just was like, 'If I say it first, then we don't really ever have to talk about it again.' And I think we both literally immediately were like, 'Well,' and hugged and then very quickly realized we have so much more in common in other spaces, and that was kind of like the least interesting thing about our relationship."

Later, Homer Gere shared kind words about his kindred costar. "She's very friendly and intelligent and quirky," he said. "She's just a good, nice person."

On Tuesday, Aug. 11, following the news of the Vogue cover reveal, Crawford took to Instagram to express her excitement for her daughter's own Vogue moment, despite the swirling negative commentary.

Reposting the cover image on her Instagram Story, the model wrote, "so proud of my girl @kaiagerber."

Contributing: Kalia Richardson, Erin Jensen

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Critics call out Kaia Gerber and Homer Gere 'nepo baby' Vogue cover

Netflix Bets on Oscars With "Ink" — Can the Early Buzz Hold?
Editorial
Film&TV

Netflix Bets on Oscars With "Ink" — Can the Early Buzz Hold?

Pop Culture

I. Deal Overview

Netflix's "Ink" is an adaptation of James Graham's stage play of the same name, which was previously Tony-nominated, with Graham himself adapting his own script for the screen. The film tells the true story of how Rupert Murdoch acquired the failing tabloid The Sun in 1969 and turned it into the starting point of a tabloid empire. Guy Pearce plays a young Murdoch, Jack O'Connell plays editor Larry Lamb, and Danny Boyle directs.

The film premiered as the opening night title at the 83rd Venice Film Festival, where it's also competing in the main competition lineup for the Golden Lion. It will go on to screen at Telluride, Toronto, and other festivals before a theatrical release on December 11, followed by a Netflix debut on January 8. The Venice premiere was warmly received by audiences, and the film currently holds a 92% score on Rotten Tomatoes and 80 on Metacritic.

By October 8, will "Ink"'s Rotten Tomatoes critics' score remain above 90%?

Yes
0.00%
No
100.00%
3 Polls

II. Production Background: The Team's Track Record

Director Danny Boyle already has an Oscar for Best Director, along with a Best Picture win, for "Slumdog Millionaire," a film that took home eight Oscars and seven BAFTAs in total. His "127 Hours" also picked up six Oscar nominations.

Writer James Graham adapted his own stage play for the screen. To avoid the material feeling too stage-bound and lacking in cinematic quality, Boyle looked to two prior successful stage-to-film adaptations as references: "Amadeus," which won Best Picture, and "Dangerous Liaisons," which took home three Oscars and received a Best Picture nomination.

On the cast side, Guy Pearce recently earned his first Oscar nomination for "The Brutalist." Jack O'Connell was part of the ensemble that won the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Cast for "Sinners." Claire Foy has an Emmy for "The Crown."

As for the producing team, Tessa Ross previously produced "Conclave," a film that turned a $20 million budget into $128 million at the box office and went on to earn eight Oscar nominations, including Best Picture, along with 12 BAFTA nominations — the most of any film that year. It marked her first Oscar nomination as a producer, and stands as evidence that her team is capable of turning a mid-budget project into a major awards-season contender.

III. A Reference Point

According to a Variety analysis, there's a recent precedent worth noting: "One Night in Miami" (2020). That film similarly saw its writer, Kemp Powers, adapt his own stage play, and it likewise launched at the Venice Film Festival. It ultimately earned a Best Adapted Screenplay nomination, while star Leslie Odom Jr. received an acting nomination as well.

Guy Pearce's recent Oscar nomination for "The Brutalist" — this time, he's expected to be positioned in a different category, potentially Best Actor — lends some credibility to this awards push, given that recognition from the Academy is still fresh. The film's below-the-line work is also considered competitive: production design by Carson McColl and Gareth Pugh recreated a version of Fleet Street that no longer exists, which could become an additional point of recognition.

IV. Current Signals: Early Buzz Still Building

From Venice to Telluride, Variety reports that the film continued to generate positive reactions during its run at the Telluride festival — the kind of momentum a Netflix awards campaign is built to amplify.

That said, the current 92% score is based on a relatively limited sample of reviews from the Venice premiere. Whether it holds at a similarly high level once a broader pool of critics weighs in at Telluride and Toronto remains an open question.

Kylie Jenner Is Facing Pregnancy Rumors Again — Will She Finally Confirm Them?
Quick Take
Celebrities

Kylie Jenner Is Facing Pregnancy Rumors Again — Will She Finally Confirm Them?

Pop Culture

The Latest

On the August episode of the "Better Half" podcast, Kylie Jenner was asked about the newest round of pregnancy rumors and gave a response that left room for interpretation: she doesn't feel "the need to say anything ever." Notably, her tone this time differs from her usual flat denials — it read more like indifference than a firm correction, leaving the door open to further speculation.

By the end of October, will Kylie Jenner officially confirm a pregnancy?

Yes
50.00%
No
50.00%
2 Polls

Not Her First Rodeo

This is a routine Kylie has been through before. In 2014, at 17, she was photographed visiting her family's gynecologist, fueling speculation that she was expecting with then-boyfriend Tyga; she shut it down with a single tweet. Around August 2015, the relationship became official, and she again denied similar pregnancy claims at the time. In April 2017, she began dating Travis Scott; pregnancy rumors surfaced months later, were confirmed that September, and daughter Stormi was born in February 2018. Now, with Timothée Chalamet — a relationship public since September 2023 — the same speculation resurfaced this August, though her response was vaguer than before: neither a denial nor a confirmation. No authoritative source, including Jenner herself, her family, or official channels, has offered a clear answer either way.

Can "the cure" Win Best Alternative at the VMAs?
Quick Take
AwardsMusicOlivia Rodrigo

Can "the cure" Win Best Alternative at the VMAs?

Pop Culture

Olivia Rodrigo's "the cure" is nominated for Best Alternative at the 2026 MTV VMAs. Released by Geffen Records on May 22, the single topped Spotify's global chart on day one with 7.21 million streams, along with domestic charts in Australia, Ireland, and Singapore, and reached the top 10 in the UK, US, Canada, and Germany. The category also includes Geese ("Taxes"), Machine Gun Kelly & Fred Durst ("FIX UR FACE"), Noah Kahan ("The Great Divide"), and SOMBR ("Homewrecker"), with the ceremony set for September 27.

By September 27, will "the cure" win Best Alternative?

Yes
0.00%
No
100.00%
3 Polls

Since the category's return in 2020, Machine Gun Kelly has won it twice, in 2020 and 2021, making him one of its most dominant past winners; his pairing with Fred Durst this year extends that visibility. Best Alternative is one of 13 fan-voted categories, with voting closing September 25 and the winner determined purely by vote count."

The cure" also lifted the earlier single "drop dead" back up 17 spots to No. 8, while the parent album, "You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So in Love," debuted atop the Billboard 200 with 485,000 equivalent album units, the best first week by a female artist in 2026. In fan-voted categories specifically, Rodrigo has a strong track record, including three wins at the 2021 VMAs, a Best New Artist win at that year's AMAs, and two wins at the 2024 People's Choice Awards — nine total wins in this format to date.